Hey, remember the debate we had about horror movie villains? You said that Freddy was unique in that only he attacked folk who did not deserve it. I ask you this; what about Pinhead?
I highly reccomend Hellraiser (though the effects are a bit dated). I'm delighted you've read the novella, though. One of my favorites; marvellous and deeply disturbing story. The movie changes things a touch in that Kirsty is now Larry's daughter, and Julia her stepmother. However, you've got things wrong in that it ain't Pinhead who kills Larry or threatens Kirsty; that'd be FRANK. Pinhead be the dude who tortures Frank and takes him back to hell. Now, I'll admit I didn't realize you only counted fatalities here, because Pinhead and his cohorts threaten Kirsty but do not kill her. So in that case, they do not kill an innocent. HOWEVER, the only thing Kirsty does to deserve Pinhead's wrath is solve the LaMarchand Box. That was more what I was thinking of; like the demon women in Ringu or Ju-on, Pinhead's chosen victims have committed no sin but that of curiosity (except for Frank). Enter a house, watch a tape, solve a puzzle box, you're dead. Kirsty escaped solely because she was willing to sell Frank out to them (though the question of how her betrayal affected her immortal soul also occurs).
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I ask you this; what about Pinhead?
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)